Bitcoin's $2 Trillion Meme: Expanding the Boundaries of Time and Space
Original Title: "Bitcoin's $2 Trillion Sun Plot: Expanding the Boundaries of Time and Space"
Original Authors: @BMANLead, @Wuhuoqiu, @Loki_Zeng, @Kristian_cy, ABCDE
The major event for Crypto in 2024, as the price of Bitcoin approaches the $100,000 mark. With Bitcoin's halving and ETF approval, Trump is about to consider Bitcoin as a strategic reserve. As Bitcoin delves deeper into the traditional financial waters, it prompts us to rethink a question:
What is finance?
At its core, finance is the cross-temporal and spatial allocation of assets.
Typical cross-spatial allocation: borrowing, payments, trading
Typical cross-temporal allocation: collateralization, interest, options
In the past, Bitcoin was only stored in wallets, tending towards stagnation in both time and space. Over 65% of Bitcoin hasn't moved for over a year, "BTC should only be held in a wallet" as if it were an ideological steel engraving.
Therefore, BTCFi has not been well regarded for a long time.
Although Bitcoin's inception was aimed at hedging the traditional financial system, and as early as 2010 Satoshi Nakamoto wrote in a forum pointing out that Bitcoin would support various possible scenario types that he had designed years before, including various DeFi scenarios, the exploration of Bitcoin DeFi or financial scenarios gradually ceased as Bitcoin's positioning shifted towards digital gold.
On another timeline, Rune Christensen announced the vision of MakerDAO in March 2013, followed by the official launch of the first DEX on ETH—OasisDEX in 2016. In 2017, still a student, Stani Kulechov founded AAVE in Switzerland, and in August 2018, the well-known Bancor and Uniswap went live, kicking off the grand DeFi Summer. This also marked the point where the future possibilities of DeFi temporarily handed over to ETH.
However, as Bitcoin's timeline progressed to 2024, Bitcoin once again returned to the center of the crypto world. The price of Bitcoin reached $99,759, coming close to the $100,000 milestone, with a market cap exceeding $2 trillion. BTCFi has become a $2 trillion sun plot, sparking new discussions and innovations around BTCFi...
1. The $2 Trillion Sun Plot of Bitcoin: BTCFi
While Ethereum launched the DeFi Age of Discovery, for Bitcoin, BTCFi may be late to the party, but it will never miss out. Ethereum, as the experimental field of DeFi, has provided valuable lessons for Bitcoin. Today, Bitcoin is like 15th-century Europe, at the dawn of a new continent.
1.1 Bitcoin Transitioning from Passive Asset to Active Asset
The FOMO nature of Bitcoin holders and the increasing motivation for active management will drive Bitcoin's transition from a passive asset to an active asset, laying the foundation for BTCFi's development.
Institutional holdings are continuously increasing. According to Feixiaohao data, a total of 47 companies currently hold $1413.42 billion worth of BTC, accounting for 7.7% of the total BTC circulation. With the approval of a Bitcoin ETF, this trend is accelerating. Since the beginning of the year, BTC spot ETH has seen a net inflow of nearly 17,000 BTC. Compared to early miners and hodlers, institutions are more sensitive to capital efficiency and ROI, not only showing a higher inclination to participate but also likely becoming active drivers of BTCFi.
The emergence of narratives and the BTC ecosystem has made the composition of the BTC community more complex. Traditional BTC holders prioritize security, placing it at a higher level. New members are more interested in new narratives and assets.
ETH DeFi is gradually moving towards its own sustainable development path. Projects such as Uniswap, Curve, Aave, MakerDAO, and Ethena have found ways to achieve economic cycles that do not rely on token incentives but rather on internal or external revenue streams.
With various factors at play, the Bitcoin community's interest in scalability and BTCFi has significantly increased. Forum discussions have become more positive, and the proposal by Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr for the [Disable Merkle Tree proposal] did not receive support and was officially closed in January this year.
1.2 The Improvement of Infrastructure Has Objectively Paved the Way
Technological limitations have also been a reason why Bitcoin has long been seen solely as a store of value, but this perception has gradually changed. The scaling debate from 2010 to 2017 culminated in the BTC fork into BTC and BCH, but the enhancement of scalability did not stop there. With two upgrades, SegWit and Taproot, laying the groundwork for asset issuance, inscriptions began to appear in people's endeavors. The widespread creation of assets has brought about objective demands for transactions and financialization. With the emergence of technologies such as Ordinal, Side-chain, L2, OP_CAT, BitVM, the construction of the BTCFi scene has truly become feasible.

1.3 Massive Demand Driving Development
In terms of transaction volume, asset diversification has already driven an increase in transaction frequency. Data from The Block shows that over the past year, BTC's average daily transfers have exceeded 500k/day, with RUNES and BRC-20 dominating. Following this, the demand for transactions, lending, credit derivatives, and interest has smoothly followed suit. BTCFi enables Bitcoin to become a productive asset, allowing BTC to earn yield from the assets it holds.

Source: The Block
In terms of TVL, BTC, as a cryptocurrency with an absolute advantage in market capitalization, has tremendous potential. Currently, the total value locked (TVL) on the BTC network is approximately $1.6 billion (including L2 and sidechains), accounting for only 0.14% of Bitcoin's total market capitalization. In comparison, the TVL to market cap ratios of other mainstream blockchains are much higher, with ETH at 15.7%, Solana and BNBChain at 5.6% and 6.8% respectively. Calculated based on the average of these three, BTCFi still has 65 times room for growth.
Mainstream blockchains with smart contract capabilities have significantly higher TVL-to-market cap ratios: Ethereum at 14%, Solana at 6%, and Ton at around 3%. Even at a 1% ratio, BTCFi still has tenfold growth potential.

Source: Defillama, Coinmarketcap

2. The First Year of BTCFi
Therefore, by the year 2024, as BTC soared to 2 trillion, it also ushered in the first year of BTCFi.
By combining Bitcoin with "Finance," it instantly unlocked the possibility of 2 trillion, expanding the boundaries of Bitcoin's time and space.
As we have previously stated: the essence of finance is the cross-temporal and cross-spatial allocation of assets.
Thus, Bitcoin Financial (BTCFi) is the cross-temporal and cross-spatial allocation of Bitcoin.
Cross-temporal allocation: enhancing Bitcoin's yield properties, such as staking, timelocks, interest, options, etc., for example:
· Opening up the time dimension for Bitcoin at @babylonlabs_io
· Bitcoin yield gateway at @SolvProtocol
· "Semidecentralization may be the optimal solution" at @Lombard_Finance
· "Comes with Pendle" at @LorenzoProtocol
· Chain designed for BTCFi at @use_corn
Cross-spatial allocation: enhancing Bitcoin's liquidity, such as lending, custody, synthetic assets, etc., for example:
· Custody platforms @AntalphaGlobal, @Cobo_Global, @SinohopeGroup
· Lending newcomer @avalonfinance_
· CeDeFi pioneer @bounce_bit
· Diverse Wrapped BTC options
· Emerging stablecoin @yalaorg
Financial applications have not only returned to the endeavors of BTC ecosystem participants but have also given birth to entirely new possibilities. BTCFi innovative projects have begun to emerge in rapid succession, forming a Bitcoin financial landscape:

Source: ABCDE Capital
Whether it is enabling "digital gold" to possess yield properties or making it more liquid, these two core functions of BTCFi are highly aligned with BTC's current main narrative. Regardless of whether the market is bullish or bearish, as long as BTC remains unchanged, as long as BTC continues to be the most recognized digital gold in the industry, the BTCFi track is unlikely to be, or rather, "unnecessary to be" falsified.
Taking gold as an example, the value of gold usually has three main pillars:
1. Jewelry and industrial use
2. Investment
3. Strategic reserve demand from various central banks
From an investment perspective, gold ETFs, after being introduced 20 years ago, propelled the gold price to soar sevenfold. The reason is that before ETFs, gold investment had only one channel through physical gold, which involved requirements such as insurance, transportation, and storage that were considered too high for many people. Gold ETFs, as a transformative existence, greatly enhanced the liquidity and investment convenience of gold by eliminating the need for storage and allowing trading similar to stocks.
Looking at BTC in comparison, BTC ETFs clearly lack the transformative nature seen in gold ETFs. This is because the barrier to entry for trading this "digital gold" was not high to begin with, and ETFs only further the compliance, regulatory, and ideological aspects. Therefore, the potential impact of BTC ETFs on the price of BTC is likely lower than that of gold ETFs. However, BTCFi, by endowing Bitcoin with a time + space financial allocation attribute, makes BTC more "useful" than before, resembling gold's jewelry and industrial use case. So, compared to Bitcoin ETFs, BTCFi may provide greater long-term assistance in enhancing the value and price of BTC.
2.1. Time: Enhancing Bitcoin's Yielding Property

2.1.1. Opening the Time Dimension for Bitcoin - Babylon
One concept closely tied to BTCFi is Babylon because having Babylon signifies the true concept of "on-chain yield BTC."
It is well known that Bitcoin uses Proof of Work (PoW), which does not have the concept of inflation/yield. Therefore, it cannot generate an annual relatively certain (adjusted based on the staking ratio curve) issuance yield of around 3-4% like Ethereum's Proof of Stake (PoS). However, with Eigenlayer introducing the concept of Restaking to the community, people suddenly realize that if Restaking is a bonus for Ethereum, it is undoubtedly a godsend for Bitcoin.
Of course, you cannot directly send BTC to Eigenlayer; these are fundamentally two different chains. From a technical standpoint, it is also impossible to fully replicate an Eigenlayer on the BTC chain, as BTC does not even have Turing-complete smart contracts. So, is it possible to move Eigenlayer's core concept of Restaking for POS Security to Bitcoin? This is what Babylon aims to achieve.
Simply put, Babylon utilizes existing Bitcoin script and advanced cryptography to simulate Bitcoin-based Staking and Slashing functionalities, without involving bridges or third-party wraps common in the EVM ecosystem that introduce security threats and centralization. Because Bitcoin's script allows for the concept of a "time lock," enabling users to define a lock period during which the Bitcoin (UTXO) cannot be transferred, its functionality is akin to that of a PoS chain's staking. Babylon leverages this feature to ensure that the BTC participating in Staking does not leave the BTC chain but is instead locked in a Bitcoin "Staking address" using time lock technology.

Source: Babylon
When BTC is locked via script, what if a Slashing mechanism is needed? How does Babylon achieve this without smart contracts?
This brings us to Babylon's use of advanced cryptographic technology - EOTS (Extractable One-Time Signatures). When a signer uses the same private key to sign two pieces of information simultaneously, the private key is automatically exposed. This is equivalent to the most common security breach assumption in a PoS chain - "signing two different blocks at the same block height." Through a form of malicious behavior that exposes the private key, Babylon effectively implements a mechanism for "automatic Slashing."
Utilizing the "Restaking" technique, Babylon is primarily used to enhance the security of PoS chains. However, to achieve a complete Eigenlayer technology stack (such as features like EigenDA) or a more complex penalty (Slashing) mechanism, cooperation from other projects within the Babylon ecosystem is still required.
Babylon has adopted an innovative approach: by self-custodying locked Bitcoin, combining on-chain staking and slashing functionalities, it has provided BTC holders with a trustless way to earn rewards for the first time. Previously, BTC holders looking to earn rewards typically had to rely on centralized exchanges (CEX) and other financial platforms or convert BTC to WBTC to participate in the Ethereum DeFi ecosystem, all of which involve a trust assumption in centralized security.
Therefore, while Babylon is designed to target Ethereum's Eigenlayer Restaking ecosystem, due to Bitcoin's inherent lack of a Staking mechanism, we are more inclined to see Babylon as a crucial part of building the BTC Staking ecosystem.
2.1.2 Bitcoin Yield Entry Solv Protocol
When it comes to the Staking ecosystem, we cannot overlook another project—Solv Protocol. Solv is not a direct competitor to Babylon but rather, through the introduction of the staking abstraction layer technology architecture, it can create various LPT (Liquidity Provider Token) products. The sources of revenue for these LPTs can be very diverse, such as:
· Staking rewards from the staking protocol (like Babylon);
· Earnings from POS network nodes (such as CoreDAO, Stacks);
· Or earnings from trading strategies (such as Ethena).
Currently, Solv has launched several successful LPT products, including SolvBTC.BBN (Babylon LPT), SolvBTC.ENA (Ethena LPT), and SolvBTC.CORE (CoreDAO LPT), all of which have performed well. According to DeFiLlama data, the TVL (Total Value Locked) of SolvBTC on the Bitcoin mainnet has already surpassed that of the Lightning Network, ranking first.

Source: Solv
Its yield mechanisms include but are not limited to the following:
SolvBTC - Can be minted on 6 chains, fully circulated on 10 chains, and integrated with over 20 DeFi protocols for earning rewards
· SolvBTC.BBN - BTC can enter Babylon through Solv to earn rewards
· SolvBTC.ENA - BTC can enter Ethena through Solv to earn rewards
· SolvBTC.CORE - BTC can enter Core through Solv to earn rewards
· SolvBTC.JUPITER and other follow-up net-value-growth yield-bearing assets

Source: Solv
Therefore, rather than viewing Solv as a BTC Staking protocol, we prefer to describe it as a "BTC Yield Vault." Solv provides a diverse set of revenue streams, whether it's staking rewards, node rewards, or trading strategy rewards, allowing BTC holders to have a more flexible earnings approach.
Moreover, Solv currently demonstrates the most impressive data performance among all BTCFI protocols:
1. Wide Coverage: Solv is currently circulating on 10 blockchains and has integrated with over 20 DeFi protocols.
2. Innovative Partnerships: For example, Solv's partnership with Pendle provides Bitcoin users with nearly a 10% fixed yield APY, with LP yield of up to 40%.
3. Broad Acceptance: The number of SolvBTC holders has surpassed 200,000, with a total market value exceeding $1 billion.
4. Strong Reserve: SolvBTC's Bitcoin reserve has exceeded 20,000 BTC.
Building on these achievements, the Solv Protocol has taken a phased leadership position in the BTCFI space and continues to iterate on its product. The next focus will be on launching more types of LST products. It is reported that Solv plans to collaborate with Jupiter to launch a new product called SolvBTC.JUP, introducing the LP yield from Perp DEX into the BTC LST product, further expanding the boundaries of BTC Staking.
Meanwhile, Babylon provides a Trustless mechanism that allows BTC holders to earn Staking-like rewards. This also paves the way for projects to compete for an ecosystem position similar to Lido, by creating liquidity assets similar to stETH. While Babylon has achieved secure Bitcoin locking and provides basic earnings, to further unlock BTC liquidity and enhance returns, BTC locked in Babylon can participate in EVM and non-EVM DeFi applications through tokenized warrants. Leveraging the unique composability of blockchain will be a key factor in constructing the LST ecosystem, with SolvBTC.BBN being a successful case study.
In addition to Solv, there are other heavyweight projects in the market also vying for LST ecosystem placement, such as Lombard and Lorenzo. These LST projects are broadly aligned in technical directions such as releasing BTC liquidity and participating in DeFi yield.
Solv's core advantage lies in its ability to offer a more diverse set of income streams for Bitcoin users, including re-staking rewards, staking node rewards, and trading strategy rewards. With this diversified income model, Solv provides Bitcoin users with more flexible and diversified options.
2.1.3 BTCHub of the Move Ecosystem: Echo protocol
Echo is the BTCFi hub of the Move ecosystem, providing a one-stop financial solution for Move's Bitcoin, enabling BTC to seamlessly interact with the Move ecosystem.
Echo was the first to introduce BTC liquidity staking, re-staking, and yield infrastructure to the Move ecosystem, introducing a new asset class of liquidity to the Move ecosystem. Through collaboration with the Bitcoin ecosystem, Echo seamlessly integrates all native BTC Layer 2 solutions, including Babylon, and supports various BTC liquidity staking tokens, making Echo a key gateway for attracting new capital to the Move DeFi ecosystem.
Echo's flagship product, aBTC, is a cross-chain liquidity Bitcoin token backed by BTC in a 1:1 ratio. This innovation promotes Bitcoin DeFi interoperability, allowing users to earn real rewards in ecosystems like Aptos, and aBTC will be fully supported throughout the entire Aptos DeFi network.
Echo first introduced re-staking to the Move ecosystem through its innovative product, eAPT. This will enable re-staking to secure projects that run on the MoveVM chain or any project developing its own blockchain, allowing them to rely on Aptos for security and validation.
Therefore, Echo will serve as the BTChub of the Move ecosystem, providing four Bitcoin-centric products for the Move ecosystem:
· Bridge: bridging BTC L2 assets to Echo, enabling interoperability between the Move ecosystem and BTC L2;
· Liquidity Staking: staking BTC on Echo to earn Echo points;
· Re-Staking: Stake the synthetic LRT token aBTC in the Synthetic Move ecosystem, allowing Bitcoin to interact with the Move ecosystem and earn multi-layered staking rewards;
· Lending: Deposit APT, uBTC, and aBTC to provide collateral lending services, with lending profits shared with users receiving close to a 10% APT yield.
2.1.4 Lombard's "Semi-Decentralization May Be the Optimal Solution"
The core feature of Lombard lies in the balance of its LBTC asset between security and flexibility. Generally, while absolute decentralization can bring higher security, it often makes significant sacrifices in flexibility. For example, the huge gap in market value between RenBTC and TBTC compared to WBTC is a typical case of this trade-off. On the other hand, fully centralized management can provide maximum flexibility; however, due to the need for a trust-based assumption and potential security risks, its growth ceiling is relatively limited. This is also one of the reasons why WBTC's market value share in BTC's total market value has always been relatively low.
Lombard ingeniously found a solution to balance security and flexibility. While maintaining relative security, it maximized the flexibility of its LBTC, thereby opening up new development space for BTC liquidity assets.

Source: Lombard
Compared to the traditional multi-signature Mint/Burn model, Lombard has introduced a more secure concept called the "Consortium Security Alliance." This concept first appeared in early consortium chains. Unlike many current DeFi projects, especially cross-chain bridge projects where multi-signature nodes are controlled by the project team, Lombard's security alliance consists of highly reputable nodes, including the project team, well-known institutions, market makers, investors, and exchanges, among others. The nodes achieve consensus through the Raft algorithm.
Although this mechanism cannot be fully described as "100% decentralized," its security is far higher than the traditional multi-signature model while retaining features such as full-chain circulation of 2/3 multi-signatures, flexible minting and redemption. In addition, full decentralization does not necessarily equate to absolute security. For example, whether it is POW or POS, the cost of attack and security model can be calculated based on the mechanism design and market value. Except for high-market-value public chains like BTC, ETH, and Solana, the security of most decentralized projects may not be as good as Lombard's "Security Alliance" model. Through this design, Lombard has achieved a balance between security and flexibility, providing users with a trusted and efficient BTC liquidity solution.
In addition to the Security Alliance's design, Lombard also employs CubeSigner, a hardware-backed non-custodial key management platform. With strict policy restrictions in place to prevent key theft, mitigate breaches, prevent key abuse, and more, LBTC's security is further strengthened.
Furthermore, Polychain's $16 million seed round investment undoubtedly signifies Lombard's wealth of resources within the industry, providing significant support for its Consortium node reputation and future integration with DeFi and other public chain projects. LBTC is bound to be one of WBTC's strongest competitors.

Source: Lombard
2.1.5 Lorenzo with "Built-in Pendle"
Compared to Lombard's unique advantage in asset security, Lorenzo, as the entry point of Binance-backed Babylon LST, also exhibits highly attractive features.
In the current wave of DeFi innovation, traditional DEXes and lending protocols mostly continue the inertia from DeFi Summer or rely on past successes. After the Terra collapse in the stablecoin race, except for Ethena being relatively innovative, other innovations appear lackluster. The only noteworthy race is that of LST (Liquidity Staking Token) and LRT (Liquidity Re-Staking Token), benefiting from Ethereum's shift to POS and the leverage effect triggered by Eigenlayer Restaking.
In this race, the biggest winner is undoubtedly Pendle. It is no exaggeration to say that the vast majority of interest-bearing assets in the Ethereum ecosystem ultimately flow to Pendle. The design of interest separation has brought a whole new dimension to DeFi: risk-averse users can obtain comprehensive hedging mechanisms through Pendle, while more aggressive players seeking higher returns can use implicit leverage to boost their earnings.
Lorenzo clearly aims to excel in this race. After Babylon introduced staking functionality, its LST product now offers similar interest separation operations as assets such as stETH, Renzo, and EtherFI. Lorenzo's LST product can be split into two types of tokens: the Liquidity Principal Token LPT (stBTC) and the Yield Accrual Token YAT. Both tokens are freely transferable and tradable, allowing holders to use them separately to earn income or withdraw BTC from staking. This design not only enhances asset flexibility but also provides users with more investment choices.

Source: Lorenzo
Through this design, Lorenzo unlocked more possibilities for participating in DeFi using Babylon staked BTC. For example, LPT and YAT can each form trading pairs with ETH, BNB, and USD stablecoins, providing arbitrage and investment opportunities for different types of investors. Additionally, Lorenzo can also support lending protocols around LPT and YAT, as well as structured Bitcoin yield products (such as BTC fixed-income financial products). In other words, Lorenzo can borrow and implement most of the innovative gameplay on Pendle.
As one of the few Bitcoin ecosystem projects personally endorsed by Binance and the only LST project in the current BTCFI track with the inherent "Pendle" attribute, Lorenzo is undoubtedly worthy of the market's focused attention. This project not only expands the boundaries of BTC liquidity but also introduces more flexible yield management and investment methods to the DeFi ecosystem, providing investors with more diversified options.
2.1.6 Chain Corn Born for BTCFi
Corn is the first Ethereum L2 case that uses Bitcoin as Gas, aiming to provide users with various financial services, including lending, liquidity mining, and asset management. The chain was born entirely around Bitcoin's financial needs, and its uniqueness lies in mapping Bitcoin (BTC) to the network's native Gas token BTCN, enabling Bitcoin to be more widely used in the Ethereum ecosystem.
Key Features:
BTCN Token:
Corn has introduced the BTCN token as the Gas fee for transactions on the Corn network. BTCN can be seen as an ERC-20 format Bitcoin mapping, similar to wBTC but with some technical differences. The benefits of using BTCN as Gas include reducing transaction costs, increasing Bitcoin's efficiency, and creating new value capture opportunities for Bitcoin.
Ecosystem "Crop Circle":
Corn has proposed an ecosystem concept called "Crop Circle," aimed at recycling Bitcoin's value in multiple ways to generate additional income. Users can stake BTCN to receive network rewards, participate in liquidity mining, lending, develop a BTCN-based derivatives market, and more.
Tokenomics:
Introducing $CORN and $popCORN. $CORN serves as the base token, which users can acquire through staking BTCN or participating in liquidity provision; $popCORN is the governance token obtained by locking $CORN, granting users governance participation and additional reward rights. This model incentivizes long-term token holding and enhances community engagement through dynamic weighting and locking mechanisms.
By bringing Bitcoin into the Ethereum ecosystem, Corn has provided an innovative L2 solution aimed at creating more earning opportunities for Bitcoin holders.
2.2. Space: Enhancing Bitcoin's Liquidity

2.2.1 Custodial Platforms Antalpha, Cobo, Sinohope
While decentralization is the absolute "politically correct" stance in the crypto space, if we exclude the FTX rug pull as a black swan event, in terms of fund security, the centralized exchanges/custodial/financial service platforms at the top of the industry actually perform much better than the vast majority of decentralized platforms. The annual losses caused by non-custodial wallets/DeFi protocols being hacked far exceed that of centralized custodial platforms by an order of magnitude.
As a result, the top-tier Bitcoin custodial and financial service platforms play an undisputed role in releasing Bitcoin liquidity, endowing Bitcoin with the function of cross-time or cross-space allocation.
Using the following three as examples:
Antalpha - With the largest Bitcoin community in the industry, a strategic partner of Bitmain, Antalpha provides ecosystem products centered around the BTC ecosystem. It offers hardware energy finance services for institutions in the BTC production sector, such as mining machine financing, electricity financing, BTC custody storage MPC solutions, and more.
Cobo - The name of the Whale is well-known in the crypto space, and Cobo's custodial wallet was co-founded by the Whale and Dr. Jiang Changhao. It has seen over 1 billion addresses and $200 billion in transaction volume to date. Cobo now offers various solutions such as MPC, smart contract wallets, and is a trusted one-stop wallet provider for many institutions and users.
Sinohope - A Hong Kong-listed company, provides not only wallet solutions but also a one-stop full-stack blockchain solution, including L1/L2 browsers, Faucets, basic Dex, lending, NFT Market Place, and other comprehensive services.
Several platforms have a large number of real B2B users and have always maintained a high level of security. Therefore, many DeFi protocols have actually collaborated with the above platforms. Here, the concepts of centralization and decentralization are not so clearly defined. Everything starts from the perspective of security and trust, finding a relatively stable balance point between technology and commercialization.
2.2.2 Lending New Star Avalon
Avalon is a decentralized lending platform that focuses on providing liquidity for Bitcoin holders. Users can use Bitcoin as collateral for borrowing, and Avalon automates the lending process using smart contracts. Avalon offers a fixed borrowing interest rate as low as 8%, making it attractive in the competitive DeFi market.
Focus on Bitcoin: Avalon has launched BTC layer2, including Bitlayer, Merlin, Core, and BoB, focusing on providing lending services to Bitcoin holders to meet the liquidity needs of Bitcoin users.
Collateral Management: Avalon uses an over-collateralization mechanism where users need to provide more Bitcoin as collateral than the loan amount to reduce platform risk.
Performance Data: The platform currently has over $300 million in TVL and is actively partnering with various BTCFi projects such as SolvBTC, Lorenzo, SwellBTC, etc., to expand its user base.
2.2.3 CeDeFi Pioneer Bouncebit
BounceBit is an innovative blockchain platform focused on empowering Bitcoin assets, transforming Bitcoin from a passive asset to an active participant in the crypto ecosystem through the fusion of centralized finance (CeFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi), as well as restaking strategies.
Features of BounceBit:
BTC Re-Staking: BounceBit allows users to deposit Bitcoin into the protocol and earn additional rewards through restaking. This increases asset liquidity and income opportunities. Users can deposit various types of on-chain Bitcoin assets into BounceBit, including native BTC, WBTC, renBTC, and more.
Dual-Coin PoS Consensus Mechanism: BounceBit adopts a hybrid PoS mechanism using BTC+BB (BounceBit native token) for validation. Validators accept both BBTC (BounceBit-issued Bitcoin token) and BB tokens as staking, enhancing network resilience and security, while broadening the participant base.
BounceClub: BounceBit offers the BounceClub tool, allowing even non-programmer users to create their own DeFi products.
Liquidity Custody: BounceBit introduces the concept of liquidity custody to keep staked assets liquid and provide more income opportunities.
This differs from the traditional lock-up model, bringing greater flexibility to users.
Through its innovative restaking model and dual-coin PoS consensus, BounceBit provides more income opportunities for Bitcoin holders and drives Bitcoin's application in the DeFi ecosystem. Its liquidity custody and BounceClub tool also make DeFi development more straightforward and user-friendly.
2.2.4 Stablecoin Rising Star Yala
Yala is a stablecoin and liquidity protocol on BTC. Yala enables its stablecoin $YU to flow freely and securely between various ecosystems through its self-built modular infrastructure, unlocking BTC liquidity and bringing significant capital vibrancy to the entire crypto ecosystem.
Key products include:
· Overcollateralized Stablecoin $YU: This stablecoin is generated by overcollateralizing Bitcoin. The infrastructure is not only based on Bitcoin's native protocol but can also be deployed freely and securely in the EVM and other ecosystems.
· MetaMint: A core component of $YU that allows users to easily mint $YU using native Bitcoin in various ecosystems, injecting Bitcoin's liquidity into these ecosystems.
· Insurance Derivatives: Providing comprehensive insurance solutions within the DeFi ecosystem to create arbitrage opportunities for users.
Yala's suite of infrastructure and products serves its vision of bringing Bitcoin liquidity to various crypto ecosystems. Through $YU, Bitcoin holders can earn additional yield in various cross-chain DeFi protocols while maintaining the security and stability of the Bitcoin mainnet; through the governance token $YALA, Yala achieves decentralized governance of its products and ecosystem.
2.2.5 The Flourishing of Wrapped BTC
WBTC
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) is an ERC-20 token that connects Bitcoin (BTC) to the Ethereum (ETH) blockchain. Each WBTC is backed by 1 Bitcoin, ensuring its value is pegged to the price of BTC. The introduction of WBTC allows Bitcoin holders to use their assets in the Ethereum ecosystem, participating in decentralized finance (DeFi) applications. This significantly enhances Bitcoin's liquidity and utility in the DeFi space.
WBTC has always been the flagship of Wrapped BTC, but on August 9, WBTC custodian BitGo announced a joint venture with BiT Global to migrate WBTC's BTC custody address to the joint venture's multisig. What seemed like a routine corporate collaboration caused a stir as BiT Global is controlled by Justin Sun. MakerDAO promptly initiated a "Reduce WBTC Collateral Size" proposal, requesting the reduction of WBTC-related collateral in the core treasury to 0. Market concerns about WBTC gave rise to a new opportunity for a new type of Wrapped BTC.
BTCB
BTCB is a Bitcoin token on the Binance Smart Chain that allows users to trade and transact on the BSC. BTCB is designed to enhance Bitcoin's liquidity while leveraging BSC's low transaction fees and fast confirmation times.
Binance is actively expanding the functionality of BTCB, planning to launch more DeFi products related to BTCB on the BSC. These new products will include lending, derivatives trading, and more, aiming to enhance BTCB's utility and liquidity. BTCB's application on the BSC has received support from various DeFi protocols, including Venus, Radiant, Kinza, Solv, Karak, pStake, and Avalon, among others. These protocols allow users to use BTCB as collateral for activities such as lending, liquidity mining, and stablecoin minting.
Binance aims to enhance the market position of BTCB through these measures and drive wider adoption of Bitcoin in the BSC ecosystem. The introduction of BTCB not only provides a new use case for Bitcoin holders but also injects more liquidity into the BSC DeFi ecosystem.
dlcBTC (now iBTC) @ibtcnetwork
iBTC is a Bitcoin asset based on Discreet Log Contract (DLC) technology, designed to offer users a secure, privacy-preserving way to create and execute complex financial contracts. Its key feature is full decentralization, as users do not rely on third-party custody or multisig mechanisms when using dlcBTC, ensuring complete control over their assets and reducing the risks associated with centralization. Additionally, iBTC's security is enhanced by its unique self-custody mechanism, where the user's Bitcoin is always under their control, and only the original depositor can withdraw funds, effectively preventing the risk of asset theft or government seizure.
iBTC also leverages zero-knowledge proof technology to enhance transaction privacy and security. Users can execute complex financial transactions in contracts without revealing specific details of the transaction, thus protecting their personal information. Through this innovative mechanism, iBTC enables Bitcoin holders to participate in decentralized finance (DeFi) activities while maintaining ownership and control of their assets.
iBTC is the most decentralized solution among all Wrapped BTC solutions, addressing the issue of opaque centralized custody in its commercialization process.
In addition to the above Wrapped BTC solutions, there are various BTC solutions such as FBTC, M-BTC, SolvBTC, and others.
III. Conclusion:
Bitcoin has been around for 15 years and has evolved into not just digital gold but a $2 trillion financial system, with waves of builders continuously expanding Bitcoin's boundaries, turning it into a new track—BTCFi. We have the following observations:
1. The essence of finance is the cross-temporal and cross-spatial allocation of assets, with typical cross-spatial allocation including lending, payments, and trading, and typical cross-temporal allocation including staking, interest, and options. With Bitcoin's market cap reaching $2 trillion, the demand for cross-temporal and cross-spatial asset allocation around Bitcoin has emerged, giving rise to the BTCFi scenario.
2. Bitcoin is poised to become the US national reserve, further becoming an asset allocated by nations and institutions, leading to a significant institutional demand around Bitcoin, such as lending, staking, creating institutional-level BTCFi projects;
3. After the improvement of Bitcoin's asset issuance, layer 2 network, staking, and other underlying infrastructure, it also paved the way for the BTCFi scenario;
4. The TVL of the Bitcoin network is approximately $20 billion (including L2 and sidechains), accounting for only 0.1% of Bitcoin's total market value, while Ethereum accounts for 15.7% and Solana for 5.6%. We believe that BTCFi still has tenfold growth potential.
5. BTCFi is developing in two main directions around Bitcoin: first, enhancing Bitcoin's interest-bearing properties, with projects such as Babylon, Solv, Echo, Lombard, Lorenzo, and Corn; second, enhancing Bitcoin's liquidity, with projects such as Wrapped BTC, Yala, and Avalon;
6. With the development of BTCFi, Bitcoin will transition from a passive asset to an active asset, and from a non-interest-bearing asset to an interest-bearing asset.
7. Comparing it to the history of gold, the launch of the gold ETF 20 years ago pushed the gold price up sevenfold. Its essence is to transform gold from a passive asset into a financial asset, enabling more financial activities based on the gold ETF. Today, BTCFi also endows Bitcoin with financial attributes of time and space, enhancing Bitcoin's financial scenarios and value capture. In the long run, BTCFi will have a huge impact on Bitcoin's value and price appreciation.
You may also like

WEEX LALIGA Partnership 2026: Where Football Excellence Meets Crypto Innovation
WEEX becomes official crypto exchange partner of LALIGA in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Discover how this partnership brings together football excellence and trading discipline.

AI Apocalypse, a massive short squeeze

The "Second Truth" of the Luna Crash: Jane Street Exits Ahead of Plunge

Jane Street Market Manipulation, Stripe Considering Acquiring PayPal, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
WEEX × LALIGA 2026: Trade Crypto, Take Your Shot & Win Official LALIGA Prizes
Unlock shoot attempts through futures trading, spot trading, or referrals. Turn match predictions into structured rewards with BTC, USDT, position airdrops, and LALIGA merchandise on WEEX.

a16z: Why Do AI Agents Need a Stablecoin for B2B Payments?

February 24th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

Web4.0, perhaps the most needed narrative for cryptocurrency

Some Key News You Might Have Missed Over the Chinese New Year Holiday

Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 24th - A Must-Read! | Alpha Morning Report

$1,500,000 Salary Job: How to Achieve with $500 AI?

Bitcoin On-Chain User Attrition at 30%, ETF Hemorrhage at $4.5 Billion: What's Next for the Next 3 Months?

WLFI Scandal Brewing, ZachXBT Teases Insider Investigation, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Buzzing About Today?

Debunking the AI Doomsday Myth: Why Establishment Inertia and the Software Wasteland Will Save Us
Editor's Note: Citrini7's cyberpunk-themed AI doomsday prophecy has sparked widespread discussion across the internet. However, this article presents a more pragmatic counter perspective. If Citrini envisions a digital tsunami instantly engulfing civilization, this author sees the resilient resistance of the human bureaucratic system, the profoundly flawed existing software ecosystem, and the long-overlooked cornerstone of heavy industry. This is a frontal clash between Silicon Valley fantasy and the iron law of reality, reminding us that the singularity may come, but it will never happen overnight.
The following is the original content:
Renowned market commentator Citrini7 recently published a captivating and widely circulated AI doomsday novel. While he acknowledges that the probability of some scenes occurring is extremely low, as someone who has witnessed multiple economic collapse prophecies, I want to challenge his views and present a more deterministic and optimistic future.
In 2007, people thought that against the backdrop of "peak oil," the United States' geopolitical status had come to an end; in 2008, they believed the dollar system was on the brink of collapse; in 2014, everyone thought AMD and NVIDIA were done for. Then ChatGPT emerged, and people thought Google was toast... Yet every time, existing institutions with deep-rooted inertia have proven to be far more resilient than onlookers imagined.
When Citrini talks about the fear of institutional turnover and rapid workforce displacement, he writes, "Even in fields we think rely on interpersonal relationships, cracks are showing. Take the real estate industry, where buyers have tolerated 5%-6% commissions for decades due to the information asymmetry between brokers and consumers..."
Seeing this, I couldn't help but chuckle. People have been proclaiming the "death of real estate agents" for 20 years now! This hardly requires any superintelligence; with Zillow, Redfin, or Opendoor, it's enough. But this example precisely proves the opposite of Citrini's view: although this workforce has long been deemed obsolete in the eyes of most, due to market inertia and regulatory capture, real estate agents' vitality is more tenacious than anyone's expectations a decade ago.
A few months ago, I just bought a house. The transaction process mandated that we hire a real estate agent, with lofty justifications. My buyer's agent made about $50,000 in this transaction, while his actual work — filling out forms and coordinating between multiple parties — amounted to no more than 10 hours, something I could have easily handled myself. The market will eventually move towards efficiency, providing fair pricing for labor, but this will be a long process.
I deeply understand the ways of inertia and change management: I once founded and sold a company whose core business was driving insurance brokerages from "manual service" to "software-driven." The iron rule I learned is: human societies in the real world are extremely complex, and things always take longer than you imagine — even when you account for this rule. This doesn't mean that the world won't undergo drastic changes, but rather that change will be more gradual, allowing us time to respond and adapt.
Recently, the software sector has seen a downturn as investors worry about the lack of moats in the backend systems of companies like Monday, Salesforce, Asana, making them easily replicable. Citrini and others believe that AI programming heralds the end of SaaS companies: one, products become homogenized, with zero profits, and two, jobs disappear.
But everyone overlooks one thing: the current state of these software products is simply terrible.
I'm qualified to say this because I've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on Salesforce and Monday. Indeed, AI can enable competitors to replicate these products, but more importantly, AI can enable competitors to build better products. Stock price declines are not surprising: an industry relying on long-term lock-ins, lacking competitiveness, and filled with low-quality legacy incumbents is finally facing competition again.
From a broader perspective, almost all existing software is garbage, which is an undeniable fact. Every tool I've paid for is riddled with bugs; some software is so bad that I can't even pay for it (I've been unable to use Citibank's online transfer for the past three years); most web apps can't even get mobile and desktop responsiveness right; not a single product can fully deliver what you want. Silicon Valley darlings like Stripe and Linear only garner massive followings because they are not as disgustingly unusable as their competitors. If you ask a seasoned engineer, "Show me a truly perfect piece of software," all you'll get is prolonged silence and blank stares.
Here lies a profound truth: even as we approach a "software singularity," the human demand for software labor is nearly infinite. It's well known that the final few percentage points of perfection often require the most work. By this standard, almost every software product has at least a 100x improvement in complexity and features before reaching demand saturation.
I believe that most commentators who claim that the software industry is on the brink of extinction lack an intuitive understanding of software development. The software industry has been around for 50 years, and despite tremendous progress, it is always in a state of "not enough." As a programmer in 2020, my productivity matches that of hundreds of people in 1970, which is incredibly impressive leverage. However, there is still significant room for improvement. People underestimate the "Jevons Paradox": Efficiency improvements often lead to explosive growth in overall demand.
This does not mean that software engineering is an invincible job, but the industry's ability to absorb labor and its inertia far exceed imagination. The saturation process will be very slow, giving us enough time to adapt.
Of course, labor reallocation is inevitable, such as in the driving sector. As Citrini pointed out, many white-collar jobs will experience disruptions. For positions like real estate brokers that have long lost tangible value and rely solely on momentum for income, AI may be the final straw.
But our lifesaver lies in the fact that the United States has almost infinite potential and demand for reindustrialization. You may have heard of "reshoring," but it goes far beyond that. We have essentially lost the ability to manufacture the core building blocks of modern life: batteries, motors, small-scale semiconductors—the entire electricity supply chain is almost entirely dependent on overseas sources. What if there is a military conflict? What's even worse, did you know that China produces 90% of the world's synthetic ammonia? Once the supply is cut off, we can't even produce fertilizer and will face famine.
As long as you look to the physical world, you will find endless job opportunities that will benefit the country, create employment, and build essential infrastructure, all of which can receive bipartisan political support.
We have seen the economic and political winds shifting in this direction—discussions on reshoring, deep tech, and "American vitality." My prediction is that when AI impacts the white-collar sector, the path of least political resistance will be to fund large-scale reindustrialization, absorbing labor through a "giant employment project." Fortunately, the physical world does not have a "singularity"; it is constrained by friction.
We will rebuild bridges and roads. People will find that seeing tangible labor results is more fulfilling than spinning in the digital abstract world. The Salesforce senior product manager who lost a $180,000 salary may find a new job at the "California Seawater Desalination Plant" to end the 25-year drought. These facilities not only need to be built but also pursued with excellence and require long-term maintenance. As long as we are willing, the "Jevons Paradox" also applies to the physical world.
The goal of large-scale industrial engineering is abundance. The United States will once again achieve self-sufficiency, enabling large-scale, low-cost production. Moving beyond material scarcity is crucial: in the long run, if we do indeed lose a significant portion of white-collar jobs to AI, we must be able to maintain a high quality of life for the public. And as AI drives profit margins to zero, consumer goods will become extremely affordable, automatically fulfilling this objective.
My view is that different sectors of the economy will "take off" at different speeds, and the transformation in almost all areas will be slower than Citrini anticipates. To be clear, I am extremely bullish on AI and foresee a day when my own labor will be obsolete. But this will take time, and time gives us the opportunity to devise sound strategies.
At this point, preventing the kind of market collapse Citrini imagines is actually not difficult. The U.S. government's performance during the pandemic has demonstrated its proactive and decisive crisis response. If necessary, massive stimulus policies will quickly intervene. Although I am somewhat displeased by its inefficiency, that is not the focus. The focus is on safeguarding material prosperity in people's lives—a universal well-being that gives legitimacy to a nation and upholds the social contract, rather than stubbornly adhering to past accounting metrics or economic dogma.
If we can maintain sharpness and responsiveness in this slow but sure technological transformation, we will eventually emerge unscathed.
Source: Original Post Link

Have Institutions Finally 'Entered Crypto,' but Just to Vampire?

A $2 Trillion Denouement: The AI-Driven Global Economic Crisis of 2028

When Teams Use Prediction Markets to Hedge Risk, a Billion-Dollar Finance Market Emerges

Cryptocurrency Market Overview and Emerging Trends
Key Takeaways Understanding the current state of the cryptocurrency market is crucial for investors and enthusiasts alike, providing…
WEEX LALIGA Partnership 2026: Where Football Excellence Meets Crypto Innovation
WEEX becomes official crypto exchange partner of LALIGA in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Discover how this partnership brings together football excellence and trading discipline.
AI Apocalypse, a massive short squeeze
The "Second Truth" of the Luna Crash: Jane Street Exits Ahead of Plunge
Jane Street Market Manipulation, Stripe Considering Acquiring PayPal, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
WEEX × LALIGA 2026: Trade Crypto, Take Your Shot & Win Official LALIGA Prizes
Unlock shoot attempts through futures trading, spot trading, or referrals. Turn match predictions into structured rewards with BTC, USDT, position airdrops, and LALIGA merchandise on WEEX.