Crypto.com Witnesses Absurd Governance Farce, Holder of 70% of Voting Power Forces 700 Billion CRO Inflation

By: blockbeats|2025/03/18 22:45:03
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: "Crypto.com Drama Unfolds as 70% Voting Power Enforces 700 Billion CRO Mint"
Original Article Authors: Symbol; Boxmining
Editor's Note: Several weeks ago, Crypto.com put forth a proposal to reissue 700 billion burnt CRO tokens. Throughout the 2-week voting period, the voter turnout failed to meet the required threshold. If sufficient participation was not reached by the deadline, the proposal would be null and void. However, on the day before the cutoff, a sudden influx of 33 billion CRO token holders joined the vote, ultimately overwhelmingly approving the proposal. This last-minute voter was none other than Crypto.com itself.

On Sunday, what seemed like a potentially failed proposal—aimed at minting 700 billion CRO to compensate for the token burn in 2021 and reintroduce it to the market—struggled with a slim lead in favor of the "yes" votes over "no" votes for most of the voting period (March 2-16) and did not reach the required quorum of 33.4% to be effective.

However, at 14:00 UTC on Sunday, a dramatic turn of events occurred when suddenly 33.5 billion CRO tokens were counted as "yes" votes, meeting the required threshold for the proposal to pass and vastly exceeding the minimum standard. The statistics show: 61.18% in favor, 17.61% against, 20.11% abstain, and 0.11% reject; with an overall turnout of 70.18%, far exceeding the required 33.4% quorum.

Crypto.com Witnesses Absurd Governance Farce, Holder of 70% of Voting Power Forces 700 Billion CRO Inflation

The last-minute surge in votes ultimately led to the proposal's approval. Source: Mintscan

The sudden surge in votes has left many disgruntled CRO holders feeling even more aggrieved, believing that trust between Crypto.com and its holders has been severely damaged. "Very disappointed," commented a CRO whale on Telegram. "They almost all voted at the last minute, setting a malicious and emulatable precedent for other projects."

The crux of the controversy lies in the fact that most of the votes came from large validators operated by Crypto.com. Three independent sources indicate that these validators control between 70% to 80% of the total voting power. As of March 10, only two of its validators—Starship and Falcon Heavy—voted in favor. Despite the "yes" votes accounting for only 11.86%, far below the 77.97% "no" votes and 8.47% abstentions, the peculiar situation did not prevent the proposal from being approved.

A representative for Crypto.com declined to comment on the matter.

As of the March 10 voting tally, data source: Mintscan

As the vote neared its conclusion, three additional validators controlled by Crypto.com—Electron, Antares, and Minotaur IV—also joined the approval camp; furthermore, two smaller independent validators, Cosmostation and Polkachu.com, indicated their support, although their votes had minimal impact on the final outcome.

Final voting results, data source: Mintscan

With the proposal's approval, the Cronos blockchain will undergo an upgrade tomorrow, during which 700 billion new tokens will be minted, while the 700 billion tokens burned in 2021 will remain out of circulation. These new tokens will be gradually released according to a five-year vesting schedule and will support various functions, including the potential launch of a CRO ETF.

However, the actions of the Crypto.com team did not stop there. Just a day after the voting ended, the team introduced another proposal to burn 50 million CRO tokens (equivalent to 0.07% of the newly minted tokens) to supplement the three previous burn events of the same amount. A CRO validator who voted against the re-minting proposal on Telegram angrily wrote, "This is an insult to all CRO holders. How dare you propose to burn 50 million tokens on the same day when you're re-minting 700 billion tokens?"

The vote on this new proposal will continue for the next two weeks.

This article is contributed content and does not represent the views of BlockBeats.

You may also like

Dune Stablecoin Research: The Flow and Demand of a $300 Billion Market

In the dataset, transfers are no longer simply labeled as pure "transaction volume," but are classified as different on-chain activities. This is the difference between "just knowing that $100 trillion has been transferred" and "understanding why it was transferred."

Stripe Annual Letter: New cognitive density is extremely high, especially the 5-level model of "AI + Payments"

Every trend here is affecting everyone's future survival.

Sam Altman's Twenty-Four Hours: The Pentagon said "no" twice, but only one was serious

In Silicon Valley, Altman's sub-12-hour move has a name. It's not called backstabbing, it's called timing.

The US-Iran Conflict Spreads to the Crypto Space: What to Expect in the Market on Monday

The most important industry in the crypto world, only 300 kilometers away from the missile's impact point

Lily Liu, the chair of the Solana Foundation, shouted "Don't waste time on crypto," is the crypto industry really dead?

The interest of the younger generation is shifting from cryptocurrency to the field of artificial intelligence, which coincides with the current phenomenon in the cryptocurrency industry.

The little deer live by the water and grass

Mining companies have never been the most devout believers in Bitcoin. Under the pressures of halving compressing profits, financial reports showing revenue growth without profit increase, and coin prices falling below mining costs, the industry is collectively de-risking.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more