GMGN Co-Creation Workshop: How to Become a Qualified P-Soldier
Original Title: "GMGN's Junior P Classroom - Gas, Gas Fee, Slippage, MEV"
Original Author: Haze, Co-founder of gmgn
During on-chain transactions, many fundamental concepts may determine the success or failure of your transaction.
Today, transaction tools aim to reduce everyone's operating threshold. Most people lack an understanding of on-chain parameters. In this article, we’ll help you get acquainted with them.
Some Basic Concepts:
· Gas Fee (GAS)
· Gas = Blockchain transaction fee
· Pays miners / validators to process your transaction
· High Gas → Transaction prioritization for packaging
· Low Gas → Risk of being stuck in the queue
Payment Methods:
· SOL Transaction → Pay in SOL
· ETH Transaction → Pay in ETH
· Different chains have different Gas mechanisms
Slippage:
Slippage = Deviation between the expected price and the actual execution price
Causes of Slippage:
· Insufficient market depth → Large order size, but pool liquidity is inadequate
· Transaction delay → Price fluctuation from submission to execution
· MEV Sandwich Attack → Bots manipulate prices for arbitrage
Example:
You use 1000 USDC to buy ETH, expecting to transact at 2000 USDC/ETH, which should give you 0.5 ETH.
But the execution price becomes 2050 USDC/ETH, and you end up receiving only 0.4878 ETH. Your slippage is 2.5%.
If you set your slippage to 0.1%, the transaction will fail directly due to insufficient slippage.
How does a MEV Sandwich Attack target you?
Sandwich Attack Principle:
· Front-running → Bots buy ahead of you, driving up the price
· Your trade execution → You only get filled at a higher price, suffering from slippage
· Back-running → Bots immediately sell for profit
Impact:
· Your buy price is pushed up, increasing transaction costs
· Bots exploit your slippage, making you buy high and sell low
Solana vs Eth on Sandwich Attacks
· ETH → Precise sandwich insertion
· SOL → MEV bots batch-submit orders, casting a wide net for sandwiches
How to Prevent Sandwich Attacks?
Enable MEV protection to reduce the likelihood of transaction snooping
· Priority Fee, also known as Bribe
· Priority Fee = Extra tip to miners / validators to expedite transaction
Components:
· Base Fee → Network base fee (Solana has a fixed fee, ETH has a dynamic fee)
· Priority Fee → Extra fee you pay to increase transaction priority
Purpose:
Enhance transaction packaging priority for faster on-chain execution. In MEV competition, transactions with higher priority fees are executed first.
Summary
On-chain transaction Gas Fee + Slippage (including your set slippage tolerance and the impact of your buy amount on the pool) + MEV sandwich collectively determine the final transaction cost.
Real-World Example:
Many people are apeing into dog coins on Solana with a 50% slippage + MEV protection. Is this safe?
· Most of the Sniping transactions are AMM trades
· You buy a token with 1000 USDC, 50% slippage, which allows for execution at an extreme price
· MEV bots front-run your buy, driving up the price (within your slippage tolerance)
· Your trade executes at a higher price, receiving less of the token than expected
· MEV bots immediately sell to arbitrage your slippage loss.
If MEV Protection is in place:
· Trades won't be precisely sandwiched (bots can't sandwich your transactions)
· If the pool has sufficient liquidity and the buy amount doesn't impact the price, the trade proceeds normally
If MEV Protection is not in place:
· Solana lacks a private Mempool, MEV bots can still see your transaction and sandwich you
If your amount impacts the pool:
· High slippage = permits extreme price changes, market fluctuations themselves may lead to losses
· Low liquidity pool = higher trade impact, prone to becoming a sandwich
How to Avoid being Sandwiched?
· Avoid using high slippage, set slippage range sensibly
· If using AMM, enable MEV protection to reduce monitoring risk
Is High Slippage the Key to Successful Sniping?
Most sniping transactions do not have such high short-term volatility, and the overflow slippage range does not have an additional success rate effect.
Mostly, it's your gas fee + your trading node + trade routing to pool factors. These factors can continuously improve your transaction success rate. Slippage is just an option in extreme situations. Most of the time, a 10% - 20% slippage is sufficient. This part can be manually adjusted multiple times during sniping to control risks effectively.
For junior traders, it's all about risking small to win big, with a small single purchase amount. A slight adjustment in slippage can help avoid most sandwiching situations.
Conclusion
When the trading venue is an AMM (Raydium), the slippage parameter determines your likelihood of being sandwiched by MEV.
If you set a high slippage tolerance, you need to evaluate:
· Whether the gas fee is high enough to avoid MEV frontrunning
· Whether the buy amount is large enough to make MEV frontrunning profitable
· Whether the liquidity pool is deep enough, or else you might experience maximum slippage
· By using batched small trades + reducing slippage, you can greatly reduce the risk of sandwich attacks and losses from small pools.
How much slippage is acceptable? How is a small trade defined?
This can only be felt through hands-on experience! It's like driving a manual transmission car—practice makes perfect!
You may also like

Will Robots Replace Humans? He Says No!

Binance Coin's Price Skyrockets 15x to All-Time High, Saved by Three Bull Market Lifelines

The organization has accessed the prediction market, but is stuck at the third stage

Head of crypto VC collective shrinks: a16z crypto fund management scale plummets by 40%, Multicoin cut in half

Arthur Hayes New Post: It's "No Trade" Time Now

Claude Opus 4.7 Review: Is It Worthy of the Title of Strongest Model?

DWF In-Depth Report: AI Outperforms Humans in Yield Farming Optimization in DeFi, But Complex Transactions Still Lag Behind 5x

The financial tricks of the crypto giant Kraken

When proactive market makers start to take initiative

Massive Whale Movement: Unstaking $84.96 Million in HYPE Tokens
Key Takeaways A crypto whale, known as TechnoRevenant, has unstaked approximately $84.96 million in HYPE tokens. The tokens…

ListaDAO Addresses Third-Party Contract Vulnerability Concerns
Key Takeaways GoPlus Security revealed a vulnerability in a contract resembling those of ListaDAO. ListaDAO confirmed that their…

Security Risks of Fake Ledger Nano S+ Devices Emerging Through Chinese E-Commerce
Key Takeaways Counterfeit Ledger Nano S+ devices are being sold on Chinese e-commerce platforms, posing significant risks to…

Wave of Cyber Attacks Hits DeFi Protocols Post-Drift Hack
Key Takeaways A significant $280 million attack on Drift Protocol set off a chain of security breaches across…

Tom Lee Says ‘Mini Crypto Winter’ Is Over, Sees Ether Above $60K
Key Takeaways: Tom Lee predicts Ether’s resurgence, projecting it to surpass $60,000 in the coming years. Bitmine suffered…

French Government Tackles Rising Crypto Safety Concerns
Key Takeaways: France is intensifying measures to counter the surge in crypto kidnappings and wrench attacks. Since early…

Europe’s Bitcoin Treasury Playbook Unlikely to Mirror US Strategy: PBW 2026
Key Takeaways: European firms are adapting unique Bitcoin treasury strategies due to distinct financial regulations and market dynamics…

Circle Confronts Lawsuit Over $280M Drift Protocol Hack
Key Takeaways: Circle faces a lawsuit for allegedly aiding in the transfer of $230 million in stolen USDC.…

Bitcoin Faces ‘Near-Term Selling Pressure’ Following Surge to $76K: CryptoQuant
Key Takeaways: Bitcoin reaches a multi-month high of $76,000, prompting increased deposits to exchanges. CryptoQuant identifies a peak…

