RedStone "False Advertising"? Anger Erupts as Only 4,000 out of 230,000 Community Members Receive Airdrop
Original Title: "Only 4000 Qualified Addresses, Has RedStone's Airdrop Angered the Masses?"
Original Author: Alex Liu, Foresight News
On the evening of March 5th, RedStone initiated its airdrop query. Since its pre-market listing on Binance on February 28th, RED has hit Binance's latest circuit breaker for 3 consecutive days, breaking above $1.40 after the price limit was removed, and is now trading at $0.87 with a market cap of $34 million and a fully diluted market cap of $860 million.
As the latest Launchpad project on Binance, RedStone saw significant participation in its airdrop event, garnering attention in the community. Known for its low-cost reputation as a price oracle provider, the project has not experienced any major pricing errors since its launch and has received support from notable investment firms such as Coinbase Ventures and Blockchain Capital. However, this shining star's reputation took a nosedive in the community after the launch of the airdrop query page last night, with some netizens even labeling it a "scam project." But why?

Looking at its tokenomics, a 10% community airdrop allocation is not considered low and does not seem to be the root of the issue. On social media platforms, community members have provided feedback that they participated in multi-year tasks (such as mining activities in Seasons 1-3, over a hundred tasks on Zealy, Lunar New Year events, etc.) but still did not receive the airdrop. In RedStone's official statement, the author found the answer.

Only those with specific roles in the RedStone Discord are eligible to receive tokens! Qualified roles include Vein Master, Deep Miner, Professor, IRL (participated in offline events), etc., and the proportion of RedStone Discord's nearly 230,000 community members with any of these roles is less than 2%!
Merely offering a small amount of tokens may not have angered community users to this extent (RedStone DC has now activated "slow mode" due to excessive criticism), but the actual reward mechanism being inconsistent with the project's promotion has led many users to feel that their efforts were in vain, which is likely the crux of the issue.

In past promotions, the project team exclaimed, "Your points will be the key basis for future airdrops!" However, in reality, the top 10 holders in the RSG Points ranking, including the 5th and 7th places, were disqualified from receiving RED tokens because they did not have a Discord role. Out of more than 170,000 people on the leaderboard, only 2296 addresses were eligible. With around 200,000 members in the entire community, only about four thousand people ultimately met the airdrop criteria, with many users receiving only a few hundred tokens. The distribution logic appeared to be very "selective" compared to other mainstream projects in the market.

Data Source: @OshinoAJ_eth
So what truly sparked the anger of community members is that RedStone's event design was full of intense "PUA" style marketing: by continuously releasing tasks to attract user participation, it created an illusion of "as long as you are diligent enough, you can receive rewards." In reality, there were invisible barriers in the threshold setting, causing many ordinary users who invested a significant amount of time and resources to be excluded at the last moment.
This goes against industry norms. Other airdrop projects in the industry usually focus more on the broad participation of users in the distribution mechanism. In dYdX's airdrop event, tens of thousands of participating and eligible users generally receive a certain amount of governance tokens; and in projects like Optimism, their airdrop rules are clear, fair, and transparent, aiming to encompass a larger number of ecosystem users.
In contrast, RedStone's "special role" threshold appears too narrow, making it difficult to incentivize long-term community activity and trust.
Conclusion
The project team may have attempted to achieve a more sophisticated incentive mechanism in airdrop distribution, ensuring that core users receive a higher percentage of rewards. However, this approach undoubtedly overlooks the contributions and expectations of the broader participants.
In the long run, airdrops are not only a means to attract users as a promotional tool but also a crucial indicator of project governance transparency and ecosystem health. The current controversy undoubtedly sounds an alarm for the entire industry: only by establishing a fair, open, and reasonable incentive distribution mechanism can users truly feel the value of participation and thus drive the continuous prosperity of the entire ecosystem.
You may also like

Will Robots Replace Humans? He Says No!

Binance Coin's Price Skyrockets 15x to All-Time High, Saved by Three Bull Market Lifelines

The organization has accessed the prediction market, but is stuck at the third stage

Head of crypto VC collective shrinks: a16z crypto fund management scale plummets by 40%, Multicoin cut in half

Arthur Hayes New Post: It's "No Trade" Time Now

Claude Opus 4.7 Review: Is It Worthy of the Title of Strongest Model?

DWF In-Depth Report: AI Outperforms Humans in Yield Farming Optimization in DeFi, But Complex Transactions Still Lag Behind 5x

The financial tricks of the crypto giant Kraken

When proactive market makers start to take initiative

Massive Whale Movement: Unstaking $84.96 Million in HYPE Tokens
Key Takeaways A crypto whale, known as TechnoRevenant, has unstaked approximately $84.96 million in HYPE tokens. The tokens…

ListaDAO Addresses Third-Party Contract Vulnerability Concerns
Key Takeaways GoPlus Security revealed a vulnerability in a contract resembling those of ListaDAO. ListaDAO confirmed that their…

Security Risks of Fake Ledger Nano S+ Devices Emerging Through Chinese E-Commerce
Key Takeaways Counterfeit Ledger Nano S+ devices are being sold on Chinese e-commerce platforms, posing significant risks to…

Wave of Cyber Attacks Hits DeFi Protocols Post-Drift Hack
Key Takeaways A significant $280 million attack on Drift Protocol set off a chain of security breaches across…

Tom Lee Says ‘Mini Crypto Winter’ Is Over, Sees Ether Above $60K
Key Takeaways: Tom Lee predicts Ether’s resurgence, projecting it to surpass $60,000 in the coming years. Bitmine suffered…

French Government Tackles Rising Crypto Safety Concerns
Key Takeaways: France is intensifying measures to counter the surge in crypto kidnappings and wrench attacks. Since early…

Europe’s Bitcoin Treasury Playbook Unlikely to Mirror US Strategy: PBW 2026
Key Takeaways: European firms are adapting unique Bitcoin treasury strategies due to distinct financial regulations and market dynamics…

Circle Confronts Lawsuit Over $280M Drift Protocol Hack
Key Takeaways: Circle faces a lawsuit for allegedly aiding in the transfer of $230 million in stolen USDC.…

Bitcoin Faces ‘Near-Term Selling Pressure’ Following Surge to $76K: CryptoQuant
Key Takeaways: Bitcoin reaches a multi-month high of $76,000, prompting increased deposits to exchanges. CryptoQuant identifies a peak…

