When Even the HODLers Start to Dislike VC-Backed Projects: How to Break the Deadlock
Original Author: haotian, Crypto Researcher
In the past few days, some new coins in the secondary market collectively experienced a pullback, seemingly reflecting the market's reaction to the current cycle of "Narrative first, Fundraising second, TGE later," a path of VC industrialized coin minting. It is worth pondering why retail investors are more willing to participate in high-risk P2P conspiracy coins on-chain but are reluctant to engage with VC-endorsed new coins. Here are my thoughts:
1) First and foremost, we must admit that the previous VC-led industry innovation-driven model has evolved into a "Funding, Coin Launch, Release" industrialized assembly line. For some time, the gorgeous whitepaper narrative + a top-tier luxurious investment lineup + seemingly glamorous large fundraising numbers + celebrity-level hype have become lethal liquidity harvesting tools that have severely eroded market trust.
While it is unfair to generalize, when a pile of projects that rarely fulfill their promises and have no wealth effect are pushed into the market, the market now irrationally equates VC projects with scams;
2) The main fatal flaw of VC coins lies in their pricing mechanism. After the project completes multiple rounds of fundraising, the valuation at TGE has already been inflated layer by layer, leading to two inevitable outcomes: first, retail buyers enter at a high cost; second, early investors have a strong selling incentive. This undoubtedly sets up a "death trap" for new coins. Following this logic, some projects are more likely to experience a downward trend post-TGE, which will in turn drag the market sentiment into a bearish direction, forming a vicious cycle.
In comparison, although community coins starting from zero on-chain with low market cap entail significant unknown risks, many retail investors are still reluctant to touch VC coins with high downward expectations and certainties;
3) A market environment facing liquidity depletion will inflict a more fatal blow to VC coins. Imagine this: when all participants know that front-running sell-offs post-TGE is the optimal strategy and shorting is the rational choice, all VC coins upon listing will face significant market sell-off challenges. In a scenario of overall market liquidity depletion, VC coins will likely become sacrificial objects.
This is akin to a "Prisoner's Dilemma" where generous airdrops from the project team will face selling pressure, and hoarding without releasing will face public criticism, ultimately leading to one conclusion: a lack of sufficient buying support;
4) It is clear to everyone that the trust crisis of VC coins needs to be addressed. How can this be resolved? The core issue lies in how to reconstruct the equilibrium of interests among project teams, VCs, and the community, for example:
1. Starting with a Low Valuation to Leave Room for Upside: The project team and VCs should accept a lower initial valuation, allowing the Token Generation Event (TGE) to be the true starting point of the project's value rather than the peak, providing the market with sufficient growth expectations. (Recently, many fundraisings were still substantial, indicating that the issue is far from being resolved.)
2. Decentralizing Some Aspects to Reduce VC Dominance: Introducing community participation in certain specific aspects through DAO governance, IDOs, fair distribution, and other means to decrease VC dominance in token allocation and increase community influence;
3. Differentiated Incentive Mechanisms: Additional incentives for long-term holders should be designed to truly reward participants and builders of the project ecosystem with value, rather than short-term speculators. This requires further enhancement and transformation of airdrop mechanisms;
4. Transparent Operations: Project teams should pick up the initial transparent accountability mechanism for regularly disclosing development progress and fund utilization, rather than solely engaging in one-sided market promotion before and after the TGE;
Above.
In fact, in the process of the maturation of the Crypto industry, VCs have made remarkable contributions. Discussing the changing colors of VC coins does not necessarily mean complete de-VC-ization. The industry cannot withstand another disaster if conspiracy groups run rampant behind an industry without VCs.
Currently, the fundraising ecosystem in the Crypto market still needs restructuring. VCs should transition from being passive "arbitrage intermediaries" to active "value enablers." Fundamentally, the dilemma of current VC coins can only reflect the market's excessive insularity. It is also a sign of the increasing maturity of the Crypto market, placing greater demands on ordinary investors on how to identify high-quality projects and make rational investments.
You may also like

ChainCatcher Hong Kong Themed Forum Highlights: Decoding the Growth Engine Under the Integration of Crypto Assets and Smart Economy

Why can this institution still grow by 150% when the scale of leading crypto VCs has shrunk significantly?

Anthropic's $1 trillion, compared to DeepSeek's $100 billion

Geopolitical Risk Persists, Is Bitcoin Becoming a Key Barometer?

Annualized 11.5%, Wall Street Buzzing: Is MicroStrategy's STRC Bitcoin's Savior or Destroyer?

An Obscure Open Source AI Tool Alerted on Kelp DAO's $292 million Bug 12 Days Ago

Mixin has launched USTD-margined perpetual contracts, bringing derivative trading into the chat scene.
The privacy-focused crypto wallet Mixin announced today the launch of its U-based perpetual contract (a derivative priced in USDT). Unlike traditional exchanges, Mixin has taken a new approach by "liberating" derivative trading from isolated matching engines and embedding it into the instant messaging environment.
Users can directly open positions within the app with leverage of up to 200x, while sharing positions, discussing strategies, and copy trading within private communities. Trading, social interaction, and asset management are integrated into the same interface.
Based on its non-custodial architecture, Mixin has eliminated friction from the traditional onboarding process, allowing users to participate in perpetual contract trading without identity verification.
The trading process has been streamlined into five steps:
· Choose the trading asset
· Select long or short
· Input position size and leverage
· Confirm order details
· Confirm and open the position
The interface provides real-time visualization of price, position, and profit and loss (PnL), allowing users to complete trades without switching between multiple modules.
Mixin has directly integrated social features into the derivative trading environment. Users can create private trading communities and interact around real-time positions:
· End-to-end encrypted private groups supporting up to 1024 members
· End-to-end encrypted voice communication
· One-click position sharing
· One-click trade copying
On the execution side, Mixin aggregates liquidity from multiple sources and accesses decentralized protocol and external market liquidity through a unified trading interface.
By combining social interaction with trade execution, Mixin enables users to collaborate, share, and execute trading strategies instantly within the same environment.
Mixin has also introduced a referral incentive system based on trading behavior:
· Users can join with an invite code
· Up to 60% of trading fees as referral rewards
· Incentive mechanism designed for long-term, sustainable earnings
This model aims to drive user-driven network expansion and organic growth.
Mixin's derivative transactions are built on top of its existing self-custody wallet infrastructure, with core features including:
· Separation of transaction account and asset storage
· User full control over assets
· Platform does not custody user funds
· Built-in privacy mechanisms to reduce data exposure
The system aims to strike a balance between transaction efficiency, asset security, and privacy protection.
Against the background of perpetual contracts becoming a mainstream trading tool, Mixin is exploring a different development direction by lowering barriers, enhancing social and privacy attributes.
The platform does not only view transactions as execution actions but positions them as a networked activity: transactions have social attributes, strategies can be shared, and relationships between individuals also become part of the financial system.
Mixin's design is based on a user-initiated, user-controlled model. The platform neither custodies assets nor executes transactions on behalf of users.
This model aligns with a statement issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on April 13, 2026, titled "Staff Statement on Whether Partial User Interface Used in Preparing Cryptocurrency Securities Transactions May Require Broker-Dealer Registration."
The statement indicates that, under the premise where transactions are entirely initiated and controlled by users, non-custodial service providers that offer neutral interfaces may not need to register as broker-dealers or exchanges.
Mixin is a decentralized, self-custodial privacy wallet designed to provide secure and efficient digital asset management services.
Its core capabilities include:
· Aggregation: integrating multi-chain assets and routing between different transaction paths to simplify user operations
· High liquidity access: connecting to various liquidity sources, including decentralized protocols and external markets
· Decentralization: achieving full user control over assets without relying on custodial intermediaries
· Privacy protection: safeguarding assets and data through MPC, CryptoNote, and end-to-end encrypted communication
Mixin has been in operation for over 8 years, supporting over 40 blockchains and more than 10,000 assets, with a global user base exceeding 10 million and an on-chain self-custodied asset scale of over $1 billion.

$600 million stolen in 20 days, ushering in the era of AI hackers in the crypto world

Vitalik's 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Summit Speech: Ethereum's Ultimate Vision as the "World Computer" and Future Roadmap

On the same day Aave introduced rsETH, why did Spark decide to exit?

Full Post-Mortem of the KelpDAO Incident: Why Did Aave, Which Was Not Compromised, End Up in Crisis Situation?

After a $290 million DeFi liquidation, is the security promise still there?

ZachXBT's post ignites RAVE nearing zero, what is the truth behind the insider control?

Vitalik 2026 Hong Kong Web3 Carnival Speech Transcript: We do not compete on speed; security and decentralization are the core

In-depth Analysis of RAVE Events: Short Squeeze, Crash, and Quantitative Financial Models of Liquidity Manipulation

Eve of Ceasefire, US Military Fires on Iranian Vessel | Rewire News Morning Brief

Figma's stock price drops over 7%, will Claude Design be the terminator?


